FREE AI Dapper Chat: Ask Online Any Entity Framework Questions

<ul>
<li>Lack of Database Abstraction: Dapper provides less abstraction from the database compared to Entity Framework. Developers have to write raw SQL queries, which might not be ideal in scenarios where you'd prefer database-agnostic code.</li>
<li>No Change Tracking: Unlike Entity Framework, Dapper does not support change tracking. That means you'll have to manage updates to your entities manually and write explicit update statements.</li>
<li>Less Features: As a micro-ORM, Dapper is not as feature-rich as Entity Framework. It doesn't provide out-of-the-box features like lazy loading, change tracker, migrations, etc.</li>
<li>No LINQ Support for Queries: It does not support LINQ to build SQL queries. That can be a disadvantage if you prefer LINQ's strong typing over writing SQL strings.</li>
<li>More SQL Knowledge Required: Given that you'll be writing raw SQL queries, your team will need to be proficient in SQL, including understanding how to avoid <a href="https://www.learndapper.com/parameters#what-is-sql-injection">SQL Injection</a> attacks.</li>
<li>Database Schema Updates: Unlike Entity Framework, which can update the database schema through migrations, Dapper lacks this feature. That could be a disadvantage when business logic changes require database schema changes.</li>
<li>Lack of a Full Query Generator: Dapper does not have a full query generator, which could lead to writing more SQL for CRUD operations compared to Entity Framework.</li>
</ul>

Advertising Break! 5 seconds left

Did you know...